Register or
forgotten your details?
 

Celibacy for all Christian gays

The opinions expressed are the authors, and not necessarily those of the Fulcrum leadership team. Messages are subject to approval before they appear online.

You are not logged on and so have only read access to the forum.
Please Login, or Sign up for a free account so you can post replies and start new threads.

Messages (newest first): [Sort by Oldest first]
 Posted by: Bowman Wednesday 18 April 2012 - 06:29pm

Afterthoughts are sometimes the most important.

As I hinted in another post this morning, it worries me a bit that some posters and some threads are locked into an unhealthy oppositionalism. Our God, our faith, and our world is just bigger than all of this, of course. Visitors have remarked on how stuck we are in patterns of conflict on a very few issues. But the truly nagging concern is that "flaming" is unhealthy for those who do it.

Unhealthy? Sure-- if one reaches the point where one is actually hearing scarcely any of what others are trying to say but firing volleys anyway, then one is practising a habit that disables concerned listening. Concerned listening is an important part of the moral life that one lives in the real world. Jesus did it. St Paul did it. We must do it. When an online pursuit begins to model interpersonal relations that would lead to moral failure in the real world, then we are using a website to rehearse moral failure. Bad idea.

 In real relationships, missteps that are indulged online are not without consequences that one might care about rather a lot. At that point, the parallel with pornography is hard to ignore.

The odds that somebody is learning to be a more polarised, less Christian listener on precisely the topics on which people need to be heard well seem, unfortunately, high.

The fact that we may be citing scripture as we do it does not magically deliver us from these consequences. Instead, it just deadens us to the scriptures too!

Now since I don't know the villagers as well as I'd like, not all are as gifted in self-control as they someday will be, and all have posted some terrific stuff, I tend not to blame individuals for the temperature of discussion. But since it takes two sides to keep up a feud, we all do bear some individual responsibility for lowering that.

We should all think twice, three times, even seven times seventy times, before posting stuff that fulfils our own desire to argue but not another's desire to be heard. And if we are sure that we are not erring in this way in our own minds, we should beware that our posts online may be encouraging this all the same.

 


 Posted by: Bowman Wednesday 18 April 2012 - 05:08pm

Origen Adam-- Nonetheless, Phil Almond is right to point out the importance of renewing a space in the church for single persons, and that such a space might be enlivened by, among others, celibate homosexuals. And you do seem to agree with that. So...?

 


 Posted by: Deleted user 2383 Wednesday 18 April 2012 - 12:43am

@Phil Almond

Unfortunately I doubt we agree on anything. We would probably disagree on what day it is! I certainly don't believe in the wrath of God nor original sin and I now attend a church which tickles my ears in the way I like.

I was just lamenting that if we'd been told to accept our sexuality but remain celibate maybe I wouldn't have been screwed-up by the ex-gay movement like I was. It makes me thoroughly angry that people like Anglican Mainstream are still peddling the lie that gay people can get healed and become straight. And so I approve of someone who is coming-out but trying to stay celibate. However as someone somewhere else remarked, he is only 29 so will probably become pro-gay eventually!


 Posted by: Phil Almond Tuesday 17 April 2012 - 08:50pm

Origen Adam

 

Having listened to the Wes Hill interview, noting your 16 April 2012 post on this thread, and recalling my 25 September 2010 post on the thread “Review of Andrew Marin ‘Love is an orientation’” it seems to me that Wes Hill, you and me are agreeing with each other, providing I and those who agree with me search our hearts to see if we have a blind spot about single people in the Church. Is that how you see it?

 

Phil Almond

 


 Posted by: Deleted user 2383 Monday 16 April 2012 - 06:25pm

Thanks for flagging this up Ambrose StJohn redivivus. I just wish that me and my peer group were given this advice 20 years ago instead of being told that "homosexuals don't exist" by Alan Storkey at Spring Harvest, and told by True Freedom Trust that we could get healed and become straight.

I see acceptance of one's sexuality and celibacy as a much better way of dealing with things than the denial of it by the church and the ex-gay movement.


 Posted by: Ambrose StJohn redivivus Saturday 14 April 2012 - 01:21pm

A new book advocates celibacy for all gay Christians, it is written by a Christian writer who is living this way.

 

He has been speaking at Oak  Hill, and also gave an interview.

 

 

http://www.oakhill.ac.uk/people/wes_hill.html



LATEST
NEWS


Archbishop's daughter spearheads drive to teach 'happiness' in churches

Top public schools have put it in their curricula and David Cameron has even set out to measure it, now churches are embarking on a drive to teach happiness to the nation. Telegraph 18 May 2013

Archbishop's daughter spearheads drive to teach 'happiness' in churches

Top public schools have put it in their curricula and David Cameron has even set out to measure it, now churches are embarking on a drive to teach happiness to the nation. Telegraph 18 May 2013

Church of England sex abuse investigation into Manchester Cathedral Dean Robert Waddington expected to overlap with police inquiry at Chetham's School of Music

The Church of England inquiry into alleged child sex abuse by former Dean of Manchester Cathedral Robert Waddington is expected to crossover with the police inquiry into historical sexual abuse at Chetham's School of Music after it has emerged that Waddington was a governor at the school between 1984 and 1993. Independent 14 May 2013

 

FULCRUM
FORUM


Women Bishops: Church in all its Fullness posted by Bowman

Daniel's exegetical outline below makes more sense of Ephesians 5:21-23 than anything else I've seen posted here. The proposed rings make obvious intuitive sense, though I am still pondering the question what algorithm, if any, could (dis)confirm these intuitions. The rings lead one to see intimacy ...

The meaning of kephale in scripture posted by Bowman

Daniel-- I was hoping for new light on kephale, but did not expect it so soon! Your "B" ring lends support to the view of Secret Villager 4976 below who sees St Paul emphasising the unity of head and body in Ephesians 5. And as I myself note below, the coinherence of the members of the pairs {God : ...

Bishops accusedof not taking politcs seriouly posted by WATERANGEL

I understand what you are saying Dave. On the issue of Bishops having day jobs, and the time constraints on attending debates, I wonder with my admitted lack of experience whether there is not a way in which a better rotation system can be worked. But also a lot of valuable people who are fully trai...

 

RECENT
ARTICLES


Rowan Williams: the Canterbury Years
by John Martin

John Martin reviews Andrew Goddard's timely memoire of the Archiepiscopate of Rowan Williams

Men and Women in Marriage: Study or Ignore?
by Andrew Goddard

Andrew Goddard offers a positive assessment of the recent FAOC document

The Church of England and the Funeral of Baroness Thatcher
by Jonathan Chaplin

A comment on the most controversial funeral of the century.......